Recommended Phone Hardware Specs You Need to Consider

Many will check a mobile phone’s relevant parameters and specifications before buying it. They will also compare related products with the same price in the industry and then conclude to see which is more worth buying. And today, we will discuss whether a mobile phone is good or bad judging by its hardware parameters. So, what are the recommended phone hardware specs you should look out for when buying a mobile phone?

As a product that integrates very diverse components, a mobile phone has many things that can be visualized, such as processors, screens, batteries, charging power, heat dissipation materials, onscreen fingerprints, and overall materials. Etc. These parameters seem very complicated.

Still, sometimes they are straightforward, especially when they have specific high and low rankings and performance comparisons with past products.

Table of Contents

Here Are Some Specific Examples Of Recommended Phone Hardware Specs To Consider Before Choosing A Phone

Hardware Specifications To Consider When Purchasing a Mobile Phone

1. Mobile Phone processor

The mobile phone processor is the core component of a mobile phone. The quality of a processor often determines the specific performance and popularity of a product because different processors have different costs, which are included in the manufacturer’s product cost. It often manifests as a difference in price.

For example, suppose you are familiar with the meaning of chip parameters. When we mention Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 series and MediaTek Dimensity 9000 series processors, we will know they are chips used in Android flagship models.

We mentioned the processors of Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 series and MediaTek Dimensity 700 series, so we can know that they are chips used in low-end Android models.

For ordinary users, even if we don’t know a chip’s specification and ranking, we can determine who performs better and who performs worse through some parameters. For example, if I tell you clearly, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+2 and MediaTek Dimensity 9200 use a 4nm process, Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G uses a 6nm process, and MediaTek Dimensity 720 uses a 7nm process.

A processor with a lower number means more advanced technology. Then, I believe you can quickly judge that Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+2 and MediaTek Dimensity 9200 processors are significantly better than Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G and MediaTek Dimensity. 720.

2. The Mobile Phone Screen Resolution.

The screen has many parameters, such as its resolution, arrangement and combination, dimming and eye protection methods, the highest supported refresh rate, etc.

Here we list a straightforward and commonly used specification – resolution.

When we say that the screen resolution of a mobile phone is only 720P, the resolutions of the other two mobile phones are 1080P and 2K. We ask whose screen quality will be better. Then I believe many people will make a judgment immediately, the screen with 720p resolution<1080p resolution<2k resolution.

This is often the case in reality. For manufacturers, screens with higher specifications require more cost. Ultimately, they can only be used on some mid-to-high-end flagship phones with slightly higher prices.

Especially with 2K resolution screens, you can hardly see them on mid-to-low-end mobile phones, and most of them will be used on more expensive flagship models.

3. Battery Capacity.

Battery capacity is a more obvious parameter. For example, If a mobile phone has a battery of only 3000 mAh. And the battery capacity of the other mobile phone is 5000 mAh, which one will have better battery life?

Most people will choose a phone with a 5000mAh battery capacity. This would be the right choice.

Read Also:

4. Charging Power.

Charging power is also a parameter that should be considered. That is to say, Apple used 25W charging, but now Android phones have gone as far as 240W charging (the fastest). Everyone will choose Android too.

5. Heat Dissipation Material.

The heat dissipation area and heat dissipation material are most apparent when comparing products of the same processor type. For example, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 processor was very hot then.

Nowadays, major mobile phone manufacturers will adopt a straightforward and crude solution: stuff more cooling materials and better quality into the mobile phone. The heat dissipation material finally achieves the purpose of reducing heat. For example, if we put 3000mm² heat dissipation material in one mobile phone and 5000mm² in another, which one do you think has a better heat dissipation effect?

6. On-Screen Fingerprint.

If you are familiar with the product technology of screen fingerprints, then it will be very easy for you to draw an accurate judgment from some professional terms.

For example, let me ask you which technology is better: short-focus fingerprint and ultrasonic 3D fingerprint recognition. Which do you prefer to use? Most people will immediately think they should choose ultrasonic 3D fingerprint recognition.

The reason is that the position of the short-focus fingerprint is lower, and the recognition area will be smaller; the final recognition speed, sensitivity, and accuracy will be inferior to ultrasonic 3D fingerprint recognition.

7. Overall Materials Used In Building The Phone.

The overall material of the mobile phone is also a parameter worthy of our attention. For example, a mobile phone is made of plastic, and another is made of glass or ceramic.

Which do you think is the best? Is the one made of plastic or glass? Or is the mobile phone experience made of ceramic materials better? Most people can also accurately judge that plastic is inferior, while ceramic is the most popular.

These three materials’ cost and process difficulties are different, which is finally reflected in the manufacturer’s product price. Mobile phones using ceramic materials are often more expensive, such as Huawei Porsche and Xiaomi’s Extreme Edition.

How Do Mobile Phone Manufacturers Manipulate Hardware Specs?

Of course, the mobile phone has many other parameters and hardware specifications that I didn’t list here. I want to tell you through the above examples that when you understand the specific meanings of some parameters, you can more accurately judge the expected performance of a product.

We judge the product through these parameters, which are often in line with our real-life experience. And this is one of the primary methods of evaluating the quality of mobile phones by parameters.

But as mentioned above, some people will tell you that it is meaningless to look at the parameters. They will tell you that the parameters have never been the most important. They believe that the quality of a mobile phone ultimately depends on optimization.

Some manufacturers always market some products with relatively low configuration, then tell users they have “Ultimate Optimization” for it. Consequently, although the specs are low, the user experience is better than competitors with higher configurations.

The manufacturer’s psychology agrees with the meaning of hardware specifications comparison. Still, when its hardware parameters are at a disadvantage, it must exaggerate the significance of software optimization to cover up its shortcomings. Otherwise, it will lose its competitive advantage.

Taking a step back, if the manufacturer can use “software-optimize” and the manufacturer upgrade the hardware to the same level as products at the same price, wouldn’t its performance be better?

For example, if a manufacturer thinks that it can optimize a 12-megapixel camera so that the user experience is better than that of a competitor’s 100-megapixel camera, have you ever thought that if this other manufacturer also uses software optimization, the gap between the 12mp and 100mp camera phone will remain wide.

Can you use more expensive and higher-spec hardware? Is it just because they save the cost of optimization? Can a manufacturer limit hardware costs while improving software optimization effects? Isn’t this the direction a manufacturer should strive to improve its software optimization cost control?

Final Thought

A conclusion can be drawn here: Regarding product experience, hardware specification determine the lower limit, and software optimization determines the upper limit.

When your product uses a better configuration, you will naturally have an absolute advantage in experience because you can also perform in-depth optimization for the hardware through subsequent system updates.

Of course, if you don’t perform deep optimization of the system, then you won’t be able to maximize the advantages of the hardware.

When your product uses a low configuration, you can get a better experience through system software optimization scheduling. However, your hardware’s lower limit has determined that the upper limit of product experience cannot be raised indefinitely.

The performance of the snapdragon 480 processor can surpass Apple’s A16 processor through software optimization, and the significance of software optimization cannot be exaggerated infinitely.

Finally, I want to say that buying a mobile phone must depend on the hardware parameters. If you buy it directly without looking at the parameters, the possibility of you being cheated will be very high.

Also, the hardware parameters judge the quality of a mobile phone. , what is more, you need to understand the true meaning of these hardware specs and the experience performance of the values represented by these parameters.

This is even more difficult for most ordinary users because ordinary people cannot clearly understand the meaning of this. Some manufacturers use these information gaps and the phenomenon that users do not understand the parameters to the detriment of unsuspecting users.

When their hardware parameters are more advantageous than others, he will tell you clearly that he has an advantage in parameters. When his parameters have no advantage over others, he will, in turn, argue that his product is optimized by software. And there are even some people who will induce users by creating fancy terms.

Why Is The Knowledge Of The recommended hardware Specs Of Phones Valuable To Users?

I want everyone to understand the meaning of the parameters and eliminate the information gap. This work is heavy and arduous. Sometimes people will even think it is meaningless, and some will even ridicule you. Who would look at the parameters if they are rich?

But I always insist that the act of acquiring knowledge is not meaningless because not everyone will not care. As long as a person can avoid being cheated through this knowledge, popularizing knowledge will have practical significance.

In real life, in addition to products such as mobile phones, there are many products that we can judge through hardware parameters. For example, when we buy refrigerators and air conditioners, we will look at the energy efficiency level and the cooling and heating performance.

When buying a car, you will look at the engine. If the industry can eliminate the information gap and allow every consumer to buy clearly, I think this will be ideal and beautiful.